Local fan reflects on how 'one and done' culture has changed the tournament's appeal
Published
AD
Every year around this time, NCAA
March Madness hits a fever pitch.
The excitement surrounding the NCAA Division I Men's Basketball Tournament is unlike anything else in American
sports. Every March arenas come to life, living rooms buzz, and bracketology
experts and pretenders alike get excited as 68 college teams begin a
single-elimination battle where one team’s dreams are realized and 67 others
are shattered in games that sometimes come down to the final frantic possession.
AD
The stakes are simple and
unforgiving: win and advance or lose and go home. That urgency fuels every
possession, every loose ball, every last-second shot and every coaching
decision.
What truly sets the tournament
apart is its unpredictability. This year annual powerhouse programs like Duke, Arizona, Michigan, Purdue and Gonzaga enter as
odds-on favorites, but underdogs often steal the spotlight, especially as
parody continues to gain ground.
Small schools from one-bid
conferences suddenly have become household names, pulling off upsets that send
shockwaves through brackets nationwide. In recent years a 12-seed knocking off
a five-seed hasn’t just been a possibility; it’s practically been a tradition.
The atmosphere is electric.
Student sections paint their faces, bands blare fight songs and neutral fans
quickly adopt Cinderella teams. Office pools and online brackets turn casual
viewers into passionate analysts, dissecting matchups and debating buzzer-beaters.
The phrase “March Madness” fits perfectly: it’s chaotic, emotional and
wonderfully dramatic.
Then there are the shining moments
like overtime thrillers, half-court heaves, breakout performances by future NBA
stars and those defining seconds in time where heroes are made. One spectacular
performance can turn a relatively unknown player into a national sensation
overnight. The tournament builds toward the Final Four, where the spotlight
intensifies and the tension becomes almost unbearable.
In the end the tournament
delivers more than a champion; it delivers stories of perseverance, heartbreak
and pure joy. For three weeks each spring, the nation shares in the madness,
united by the simple magic of college basketball.
AD
So with all that going for it,
why have I completely lost touch with the tournament that used to mean so much
to me?
All signs point toward one simple
factor: the one and done.
Since I have no ties to any
particular school, it was always easiest for me to root for programs that built
time making you get invested in them, teams that featured a group of seasoned
seniors who stuck with the program and grinded out careers that said, “I’m not
here for an NBA paycheck; I’m here for the glory of capturing an NCAA
championship.”
Back in the day, it was teams with no
future NBA stars, like North Carolina State’s almost ridiculous win over a
powerhouse Houston team loaded with NBA legends in 1983.
It was Villanova’s band of gutsy
no-names who worked together for years to somehow knock off Goliath-like
Georgetown in a 1985 title game that was incredibly improbable.
It was inconsequential players
like Rumeal Robinson leading Michigan to a title in 1989 or watching Danny
Manning play four years at Kansas to cap off his incredible career or Danny
Ferry going the distance for Duke.
It used to be a person could
invest in a team or program because they built trust with guys who hung around
and made you get invested because they gave their all for the program.
I don’t feel that same sense of
commitment today.
Instead, what I see in college
basketball is a breeding ground for the NBA. It has become great players
playing for one year and scampering off to the NBA to grab the ultimate prize —
financial gain.
Now I don’t fault these players
for doing so, and in fact, I applaud them for taking that leap as early as
possible because one never knows when injury could derail a career forever.
Many of the greatest talents have
come through hardship growing up, never having much, always having to fight for
everything they could get, and basketball is their ticket to a better world — a
more secure financial world.
That is wonderful for them, and
I’m happy for them, but while they are making their play for riches, it has
robbed the NCAA game of what I found attractive, that being a four-year
commitment to taking a program to the ultimate heights in college basketball.
Thus the NCAA tournament has lost
its luster. In my eyes it has become a lesser product, despite continuing to
have all the aforementioned excitement, because I can’t get invested in players
who are here one year and gone the next.